![]() ![]() 'In addition to a video capture engine that is faster than anything else on the market, Snapz Pro X for Mac has so many other new features, you'll quickly wonder how you ever lived without it. ![]() We didn't follow the industry trend of bloated software with extraneous features instead we rethought the product. From Retina Display support to window capture with alpha masks (transparency), the app has it all! The tool's interface has been completely redesigned to provide more powerful features while maintaining the app's elegant simplicity. Rather than just tossing new features into an already full-featured product, we carefully examined how people use the tool, and developed a new user interface that adds functionality without adding complexity.!'įor those who need static screen captures for manuals, web sites, etc., the app offers many improvements. ![]() One of the most useful is 'Live Preview' which shows you exactly how your screenshot will look before you save it to disk. This allows you to change drop shadow, scaling, cropping, and other settings on the fly. No longer will you have to guess what your screenshots will look like - now you can get them right the very first time. Snapz Pro X supports saving screenshots as. pdf, or Photoshop files with precise control over image compression. It might be than I’m not aware of some magic button in FCPX but as I said, I did experiment with Motion5 as well, changing export settings like turning off Motion Blur, Frame Blending, all sorts of things… but still the same, as soon as scale changes from 100% everything gets blurry.Screenshots can be scaled, cropped, color depth-changed, and dithered. Hey Humberto, the problem still there, can’t quite figure out why, but FCPX and even Motion5 do Transform scale in different way or using different algorithm than FCP7 and FCP7 result looks a lot better to me!įor example, in Apple ProRes4444 using Transform function to Scale from 100% to 103% over 10 seconds, I do this a lot in my screencast to create an illusion of movement in static images, export from FCPX you can see blurring straight away and it sort of changes every frame, export the same clip, all identical settings, from FCP7 I get some artefacts, but picture looks miles better and manages to maintain clarity and sharpness. I suspect I’m doing something wrong, but since the source material is identical, as well as codecs (capture Apple Animation convert to Apple ProRes 422 (HQ) for editing), I cannot understand how a new Final Cut Pro give such poor results?Īnd NO! I wouldn’t like to use another program like Motion to do such basic thing like zoom in/out In FCP7 Motion tab I could easily go up to 200-250% Scale and have very clear sharp picture, but with FCPX any Transform Scale amount blurs the picture and kills the detail? Some things are very quick and easy in FCPX especially for my needs, however I can’t get my head around some bizarre quirks?įor keyframe linear ease and out nonsense at least there’s a work around, but for Zoom In picture quality I can’t find a solution and have to resort to going back to FCP 7 for very basic motion effects.īasically, my question is: has anyone else noticed a massive difference in picture quality when zooming in? ![]() I have been happily working with FCP 7 but now trying to take a leap into FCP X! I make very simple ‘software how-to’ video tutorials using Snapz Pro X screen capture program and Final Cut Pro. Hi! I’m new to the forum, so apologies if this has been covered elsewhere… ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |